Nigeria has produced some of the most used financial products on the continent. Kuda. Moniepoint. Opay. Millions of Nigerians use these platforms daily — to send money, pay bills, collect revenue, run businesses. By any measure of adoption, the Nigerian tech story looks like a success. The question nobody asks loudly enough is who that success belongs to.
The answer is not Nigerian. Kuda raised from international investors. Moniepoint raised from international investors. Opay, which built its entire business on Nigerian customers, Nigerian merchants, and Nigerian transactions, is planning to list on the US stock exchange — not the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The capital these businesses attracted came from abroad. The returns those investors expect will leave with them. What stays in Nigeria is the product. What leaves is the value.
This is not an accident and it is not a criticism of the founders who built these businesses. Raising capital from where capital exists is rational. The problem is structural. Nigeria has no serious pool of local institutional capital willing to back technology businesses at the level foreign investors do. So the businesses that grow large enough to matter end up owned, in meaningful part, by people who have never set foot in Lagos. The market is Nigerian. The ownership is not.
The standard response is that foreign investment is a net positive — jobs are created, products are built, the economy benefits. That is partially true and entirely insufficient as an argument. When Opay lists in New York, the wealth event goes to its investors. Nigerian users made that valuation possible. Nigerian merchants processed the transactions that built the revenue. The people who actually created the value are not the people who will capture it. That gap is what foreign ownership of Nigerian tech actually means in practice.
The behaviour this produces at the company level is equally telling. Businesses optimise for the metrics their investors care about. When those investors are sitting in San Francisco or London, the metrics that matter are the ones that make sense in those rooms — user numbers, transaction volume, international comparability. The specific realities of the Nigerian market, the decisions that would make these products genuinely better for the people using them, get filtered through what can be explained on a call to someone who has never had to navigate a Nigerian bank's mobile app on a slow connection. The product serves the business. The business serves the investor. The customer is somewhere further down that chain.
None of this changes until the ownership changes. That requires local capital, local investors who understand that the Nigerian market is not a proof of concept for something bigger — it is the thing itself. It requires founders who are willing to take longer, harder paths to build businesses that stay Nigerian in the ways that matter. It requires an honest reckoning with the fact that celebrating a billion-dollar valuation built on Nigerian users while the upside flows to Geneva is not the same as building something for Nigeria.
The tech exists. The users exist. The revenue exists. The question of who it ultimately serves is still being answered — and right now, the answer is not what it should be.
Copy link
