It is almost ironic how many businesses have entered food delivery in Nigeria without sitting with the actual conditions of the market. Not the market as it appears in a pitch deck or a TAM calculation — the market as it exists on the ground, with the roads, the traffic, the customer behaviour, and the infrastructure that either supports or defeats every assumption the business was built on.
Jumia learned it late. Bolt learned it and left. Both came with capital, brand recognition, and operational experience across multiple markets. The infrastructure still won. When two businesses of that size, with those resources, could not make the model work at scale, the honest response from every founder eyeing the space should have been a serious question about what they know that those businesses did not. That question rarely gets asked.
The standard explanation for why these businesses struggled is execution. The argument is that they moved too fast, or too slow, or made the wrong hires, or misread the customer. Execution failures are real but they are not the whole story. The deeper issue is that food delivery as a mass market product requires a baseline of infrastructure that Nigeria does not yet have — reliable roads, predictable traffic conditions, a customer base with consistent spending power and a habit of ordering digitally, and a logistics network that can absorb the volume a mass market demands. None of these conditions are in place. The businesses that entered the market at scale did not fail only because of what they did wrong. They failed because the terrain itself was not ready.
Food delivery in Nigeria is a niche product. It serves a specific customer — urban, digitally active, with enough disposable income to pay a delivery fee on top of the cost of the food, and enough trust in the platform to order without seeing the kitchen. That customer exists. That customer base is not the mass market. It will not become the mass market in the next decade when you factor in the infrastructure gap, the distribution of income, and the pace at which ordering behaviour is actually changing outside of the major cities.
The founders who enter this space knowing this can build something real and profitable within that niche. The founders who enter it believing they are building the next category-defining platform for two hundred million people are not reading the market they are actually in. They raise capital, go to war with the terrain, and when the terrain wins they blame the market. The same market they refused to study before they started.
Some already know this — which is why they package the food delivery play inside a super app model. The logic is that if delivery alone cannot justify the economics, surrounding it with payments, groceries, and logistics makes the overall business defensible. That logic is not wrong. What it is, is an admission that food delivery by itself does not work the way the original pitch described it. The super app is a restructuring, not a strategy. The businesses that survive in this space will be the ones that understood what they were building from the beginning — a profitable niche business with clear unit economics — not the ones that raised money to solve an infrastructure problem that no amount of capital has yet solved.
Copy link
